What’s in a name?

by Gregg Hake on May 19, 2012

What’s in a name? That which we call a rose by any other name would smell as sweet…” – William Shakespeare

Since the beginning of recorded history, man has been curious about the world around him. His inquiry, fueled by the desire to understand his existence and purpose, is largely confined within two major frameworks: mythological/religious and scientific.

The myths and religious beliefs tend to evoke and emphasize both thought and feeling by way of elaborate and beautiful stories, music, art and more, while the scientific approach rests more squarely on the cold and hard intellectual facts of life. Advocates of the former direct their inquiry to the totality of the phenomena they seek to explain and favor answers which point to the whole of truth, while proponents of the latter prefer to examine, describe and understand the component parts of the whole with the goal of eventually finding answers to the same questions about life and existence.

The myths/religious belief systems give answers to the largest questions of life, such as “Who am I,” “Why am I here” and “Where am I going” while the scientific approach typically focuses on identifying concrete answers to questions significantly more limited in scope. What interests me most about these two approaches, however, is that they share a common goal: understanding.

In some ways the religious framework has provided more words and concepts to describe the invisible aspects of life, but certain branches of science, such as quantum physics, are working hard to the same end. Whether the twain shall meet I cannot be sure, as both approaches tend to crystallize that which is inherently flowing and therefore divide more than they connect using the analogy in yesterday’s post.

Is the gold rush for information going to end in a bust? Is it nothing more than a trip down the rabbit hole? Time will tell. Do the religious approaches thin the veil which divides wisdom and knowledge? It shall be shown.

In the meantime, we have limited symbols – words and concepts – made available to us by both approaches through which we can peer to find insight into absolute truth.

{ 7 comments }

The Missing Link

by Gregg Hake on May 18, 2012

If a scientist names an object, say a star, does it change it’s reality in any way? I think not. A star is a star, or as my mother likes to say, “It is what it is,” regardless of what some man or woman on earth names it.

The words or characters used in any language symbolize that which they attempt to describe. In this sense they connect an observer with the essence of something outside of himself. The same words or characters symbolize and therefore represent the reality of the object and as such they also divide or put something between the observer and the object. That which divides also connects.

In some cases, the words come quite close to representing the true nature of the object in question, as with onomatopoeic words like “cuckoo” or “pow.” But even the best imitation is only a close approximation. In other cases the words or symbols used are quite abstract and therefore more primarily divisive than connective in nature.

Modern language excels at describing visible, tangible and physical phenomena. It is relatively weak when it comes to describing the invisible, intangible, energetic yet omnipresent aspect of the universe in general and our lives in particular. Descriptions of the physical anatomy and the biochemistry of the human body, for instance, are elaborate, but trying to label the subtler physics or energetic nature of the same body can be quite a task. There just aren’t words to describe it in our present vocabulary.

The vocabulary of a people provides insight into their state of consciousness. If my analysis is correct, we tend to live on the outer surface of life. Our understanding of the provenance and inner workings of life is quite shallow. We see, give more weight to and are prone to confine our thinking to that which is obvious and visible. As such, the subtler or finer essences of life tend to be either overlooked, undervalued or dismissed entirely.

The question raised in all of this is: how do we develop a vocabulary in a way that connects man to the subtle essences of existence more than it divides? More on this tomorrow…

{ 11 comments }

The Will of Love

05.17.2012

“Love seeketh not itself to please, nor for itself hath any care, but for another gives its ease, and builds a Heaven in Hell’s despair.” ~ William Blake Love intensifies all things. It is the presence of presences; its absence is hatred. All that is consistent with its spirit is drawn nigh unto it. All [...]

8 comments Read the full article →

Praise or Persecution

05.16.2012

In the face of persecution, you have two options. You can either assume the role of the victim and be overcome by the attack or you can use the energy focused against you to move you closer to your goal. There is only one energy. There is no “good energy” or “bad energy.” Energy can [...]

7 comments Read the full article →

Out of Position

05.15.2012

“It is folly for an eminent man to think of escaping censure, and a weakness to be affected with it. All the illustrious persons of antiquity, and indeed of every age in the world, have passed through this fiery persecution.” – Joseph Addison Fallen human consciousness rejects messengers of truth in the present and reveres [...]

8 comments Read the full article →

Relax into the Pressure

05.14.2012

The exercise of judgment destroys your capacity of discernment. In no instance is this more self-evident than in the matter of handling pressure. The ability to relax into pressure rather than judge it and consequently react negatively or withdraw from it is one of the greatest keys to unlocking your full potential in living. Increases [...]

6 comments Read the full article →
UA-13089741-1